Search for: "Law v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 60,781
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2025, 4:25 am
Case date: 15 November 2024 Case number: No. 23-2000 Court: United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Trade Mark Law in Europe: Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Fourth Edition by Ulrich Hildebrandt€ 176 Concise… [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 10:26 pm
Both women reside in the United States on lawful, temporary, nonimmigrant visas. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 8:26 pm
United States (1926) with Humphrey's Executor v. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 1:50 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 1:49 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 1:38 pm
Brazil (2009) and CAJAR v. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 12:35 pm
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2025.html United States, et al. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 12:25 pm
” She argues that both the nature and importance of facts has been underdefined and is in flux, nonetheless tracing it to the foundational cases of United States (U.S.) copyright law, and argues for a stronger exclusion of facts, which are publici juris, and belong in the public domain. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 11:49 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 11:16 am
” The Court did not say the assignee “holds exclusive rights in all countries other than the United States,” the Court said that the assignee holds “nothing. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 8:52 am
“The United States Supreme Court has resoundingly rejected the president’s interpretation of the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment,” Boardman said. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 6:57 am
In Plyer v. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 4:00 am
Since the Supreme Court’s 1898 decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 9:01 pm
See Prosecutor v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 4:19 pm
Knauff v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 3:58 pm
State of Washington v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 1:29 pm
” The executive order also states that the Biden administration’s application of Bostock v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 10:08 am
The EO declares that “[i]t is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 7:47 am
The United States Supreme Court clarified this month in Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 7:47 am
The United States Supreme Court clarified this month in Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]