Search for: "Law v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 61,105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2025, 2:26 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2025, 9:32 am
In Beard v. [read post]
8 Mar 2025, 6:28 am
By Clare Atkinson, legal intern & Natalie Kemper, legal intern & Tamar Ezer, Associate Director, Human Rights Clinic, University of Miami School of Law Reproductive rights in the United States (U.S.) are no longer secure. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm
In Dred Scott v. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 12:30 pm
" For more than 20 years, Montana, the United States, and hydroelectric dam owners have litigated about which government owns the riverbeds where the dams sit, and, thus, to whom the dam owners must pay rent. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 11:37 am
Although counsel declares generally that others have similar fears, the declaration is not sworn or made under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States and is thus inadmissible. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 10:46 am
Brehm v. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 9:18 am
Subpoena laws vary slightly from state to state, so you must contact an experienced car accident lawyer if unsure of your state’s guidelines. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 9:05 am
Important Distinctions In Selective Enforcement Law Developer Actions Vs. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 8:55 am
In the Second Amendment case of United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 7:50 am
Votes: Both to vacate as moot Grants Pass v. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 7:05 am
First was Biden v. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 4:30 am
United States, which established that Congress can set statutory protections preventing the arbitrary removal of officials from independent regulatory agencies. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 4:10 am
On Wednesday, both parties filed a Stipulation of Dismissal (full text) in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 3:41 am
To establish priority, Petitioner Kennedy had to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that it owns proprietary rights in "a mark or trade name previously used in the United States . . . and not abandoned . . . . [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm
United States, which held that presidents cannot fire federal agency heads without cause. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 9:00 pm
Passing a law to the contrary, therefore, would violate a state oath of office to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 8:26 pm
Both Michigan and the United States concede that courts disagree about whether restitution is civil or criminal. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 4:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 3:04 pm
United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935), the 90-year-old Supreme Court precedent affirming Congress’ power to limit the president’s ability to remove officers of independent administrative agencies created by legislation, as we reported here. [read post]
