Search for: "Lawrence V. Jackson" Results 1 - 20 of 129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2015, 10:07 pm by Simon Gibbs
In what is unlikely to be the shock judgment of the year, the Supreme Court has declined to strike down the pre-Jackson funding regime in Coventry & Ors v Lawrence & Anor [2015] UKSC 50. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am by Sam Claydon, Olswang LLP
Coventry v Lawrence The question that came before the Supreme Court in Coventry v Lawrence was whether recoverability of success fees and ATE policy premiums in addition to base costs breached the unsuccessful defendant’s right to a fair trial under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and, by extension, infringed Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention (the right to protection of property). [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Workers' Compensation Board’s granting an award for a work-related injury does not, "by operation of collateral estoppel,” automatically entitle the claimant to General Municipal Law §207-c benefitsJackson v Barber, 2015 NY Slip Op 08025, Appellate Division, Third Department Lawrence Jackson, diagnosed with plantar fasciitis* in his left foot while working as a correction officer for the Cortland County Sheriff's Department, filed an… [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:44 pm by John Elwood
Jackson, 10–797, may be under consideration for summary reversal. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:32 am by Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
Lord Neuberger also mentioned a case to be heard by the Supreme Court in February 2015 which will consider whether the Access to Justice Act 1999 (repealed by the 2012 Act) is consistent with a defendant’s Article 6 rights, due to the provision for a 100% costs uplift and ATE premium being fully recoverable (Coventry & Ors v Lawrence & Anor UKSC 2012/0076). [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 8:20 am by Max Mallory
  Lawrence Hurley of Reuters has coverage of the Court’s grant in Lexmark International v. [read post]