Search for: "Lawrence V. Jackson" Results 1 - 20 of 132
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2015, 10:07 pm by Simon Gibbs
In what is unlikely to be the shock judgment of the year, the Supreme Court has declined to strike down the pre-Jackson funding regime in Coventry & Ors v Lawrence & Anor [2015] UKSC 50. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am by Sam Claydon, Olswang LLP
Coventry v Lawrence The question that came before the Supreme Court in Coventry v Lawrence was whether recoverability of success fees and ATE policy premiums in addition to base costs breached the unsuccessful defendant’s right to a fair trial under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and, by extension, infringed Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention (the right to protection of property). [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:40 am by sally
‘In a stunning decision, the Supreme Court has given an indication that the pre-Jackson costs regime may breach the rights of paying parties under the European Convention of Human Rights. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Workers' Compensation Board’s granting an award for a work-related injury does not, "by operation of collateral estoppel,” automatically entitle the claimant to General Municipal Law §207-c benefitsJackson v Barber, 2015 NY Slip Op 08025, Appellate Division, Third Department Lawrence Jackson, diagnosed with plantar fasciitis* in his left foot while working as a correction officer for the Cortland County Sheriff's Department, filed an… [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 7:42 pm by richbailey
Peter Decherney, an associate professor of film studies at the University of Pennsylvania, makes arguments about film that are similar to what conductor Lawrence Golan, the lead plaintiff in Golan v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:44 pm by John Elwood
Jackson, 10–797, may be under consideration for summary reversal. [read post]