Search for: "Lawrence B. Ebert"
Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2007, 2:43 pm
In response to my previous posts on patent application allowance rates, reader Lawrence B. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
In response to my previous posts on patent application allowance rates, reader Lawrence B. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 4:36 pm
From patent lawyer Lawrence B. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 10:14 am
Comments to a 17 March 2008 post on californiastemcellreport included: Lawrence B. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 10:55 am
From patent lawyer Lawrence B. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 10:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Most Senators never even knew that their vote on appropriations also included major changes in U.S. patent law.IPBiz thinks the current patent reform efforts started in 2005.Lawrence B. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 11:26 pm
.: IPBiz notes that it is not totally clear whether the 44% relates to fiscal 2007 [as does the 362,000 number] or for some other time period. ]Note: Lawrence B. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 9:36 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See also Carbon,Volume 33, Issue 7, Pages 1007-1010 (1995) LBE would agree with: I support the comment of Lawrence B. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 1:34 am
[Lincoln] had reservations as to where certain patents were reaching.LBE has an article in the December 2006 issue of JPTOS, which gets into certain Civil War patents: Lawrence B. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 3:14 am
Ebert, "Patent Reform 2005: Sound and Fury Signifying What? [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
TODAY, Sept. 2004, at 34, 34–37 (discussing the history of the transistor), and Lawrence B. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 5:01 am
He practises with the Strasbourg firm of Meyer & Partenaires and is obviously a man to be taken seriously.IPBizAnother blog that the IPKat religiously added to his list of favourites and then promptly forgot to check up on is Lawrence B. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:16 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Although Taney applied a "what was the status (of African Americans) at the time of the signing of the Constitution" to infer "not citizens then or now", Curtis pointed out, as a factual matter, this simply was not true.ANDsee also, Lawrence B. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 11:44 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Denmead,56 U.S. 330 (1854); Taney was on the opposite side) and Curtis' brother was a patent lawyer.See for example, Lawrence B. [read post]