Search for: "Lawrence Cunningham" Results 101 - 120 of 165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2011, 11:29 am by Paul Kirgis
Lawrence Cunningham (GW Law) has posted his forthcoming article Rhetoric vs. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 7:51 am by Kali Borkoski
At Concurring Opinions, Lawrence Cunningham discusses AT&T v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:12 am by Walter Olson
[Romenesko/Washington Post, Radley Balko, Atlantic Wire, Coyote (FLSA is a more unreasonable law than you may assume), Max Kennerly ("unjust enrichment" theories not going anywhere), Volokh (next: suits on behalf of unpaid commenters), Lawrence Cunningham ("close to zero" chance of suit prevailing)] Tags: class actions, wage and hour suits Related posts Yogurt marketing class action (1) Yes, I’m being facetious (16) Xbox 360 lawsuit bogus? [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 11:43 am by Chad Oldfather
It might be worthwhile to revisit the conversation started in this post by Lawrence Cunningham.  [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 7:03 am by Securites Lawprof
Cunningham, George Washington University Law School, was recently posted on SSRN. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 12:49 pm by propertyprof
Snagging an idea from Lawrence Cunningham's post on Contracts casebooks, I decided to check out the Amazon sales of leading property textbooks. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 6:12 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Lawrence Cunningham muses on Contract law case books: I’ve become aware of the current rich state of offerings in the field of Contracts.  [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 7:51 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
At Concurring Opinion, Lawrence Cunningham asks what damages E&Y could afford.   [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:28 am by Deepak Gupta
You can watch me attempt to defend our side on Fox Business: Watch the latest video at video.foxbusiness.com For a much broader perspective on the Supreme Court's FAA jurisprudence, check out the recent posts by Lawrence Cunningham of George Washington Law at Concurring Opinions (here, here, and here), discussing Concepcion and previewing his forthcoming law review article on the uneasy relationship between the Court's cases and traditional notions of contract law. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:24 am by James Bickford
In anticipation of the Court’s decision in the case, Lawrence Cunningham of Concurring Opinions looks at “occasions when the Court’s federal arbitration jurisprudence is at odds with the common law of contracts.” [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 4:28 pm by Art Hinshaw
Over on the Concurring Opinions blog Lawrence Cunningham from GW has been following the Supreme Court’s arbitration jurisprudence for some time.  [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 6:24 pm by lpbncontracts
As Frank mentioned earlier, over at Concurring Opinions, Lawrence Cunningham (Geo Washington) provides a recap of the oral argument in AT&T v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:43 pm by Deepak Gupta
Lawrence Cunningham, Argument in Class Waiver Case Favors Consumers, States, Concurring Opinions "The Supreme Court seemed disinclined to let companies use legal fine print to block class actions, with several justices suggesting they might defer to state courts that ruled in favor of consumers." [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 10:51 am by Steve Bainbridge
Lawrence Cunniungham has a detailed analysis of the oral argument in the big class action case (AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:02 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Lawrence Cunningham gives Nocera a well-deserved smack down in connection with Nocera's conflicts of interest with respect to his coverage of H-P and Oracle. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 6:12 am by Walter Olson
[Lawrence Cunningham, ConcurOp] Other protections for client confidentiality remain intact, of course: “N.J. [read post]