Search for: "Layman v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 186
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2023, 5:33 am
Counsel needs to explain what testimony under oath means in layman terms and that the defense attorney will cover what are called “admonitions” at the beginning of the deposition proceeding. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:38 am
App. 369, 754 S.E.2d 451 (2014) (citing State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 5:33 pm
Here is a pdf copy of the Moseley v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 11:48 am
From Davis v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 2:10 pm
” In layman’s terms, rhetoric concerns the discourse regarding how situations are framed. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
The parties debated them forcefully on the House and Senate floor, in state houses, and in campaigns up and down the ballot. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 8:34 am
Rev. 961, 967 (1970). 2 Deni Assocs. of Florida, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 12:06 pm
Winter v NRDL (2008) is the leading case for requirements for preliminary injunctive relief. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:05 pm
The last gasp was an effort to stop the federal lawsuit because there was a parallel state court action based entirely on state law principles. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am
To mark this celebration of Sandy’s 40 years at the University of Texas, I want to argue that constitutional faith provides a path back to democracy in the United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 3:09 am
While the Supreme Court in Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 12:26 pm
J.E.B. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 5:38 pm
” Hemingway v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 5:23 am
Roberto Coin, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 1:59 am
In layman’s terms, not as strong as the iPhone mark but still a protectable mark and, of course, it is registered. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:22 pm
Layman, 109 N.J. 319, 334 (1988). [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 4:13 pm
1532: During the reign of Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, law passed stating the opinion of medical men must be formally given in the cases of violent death. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 10:08 am
Designs, Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 10:47 am
Supreme Court denied a petition for certiorari (which, in layman’s terms, is simply a formal request to review a lower court’s ruling) in the case of Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. [read post]
