Search for: "Layman v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 188
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2015, 12:47 pm by Jeremy
This got short shrift from the judge who quoted the Hoffman v Dare judgment. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 7:11 am by Joy Waltemath
Furthermore, his credibility determinations were not helpful to the jury and his legal conclusions were inadmissible (Easton v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 8:54 am
  Another example can be found in the dissenting opinion of Balla v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:07 am
This week the US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit upheld a District Court’s judgment in a New York case, Saladino v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 5:53 am by Jim von der Heydt
 I also proposed that there is an enormous amount of work to do to understand the nature of Justice Roberts' restraint in NFIB v. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:36 am
In layman's terms this means that you would not call a nappy a 'baby dry' and as such the term Baby Dry is not as a whole descriptive of nappies. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 1:59 am by Afro Leo
In layman’s terms, not as strong as the iPhone mark but still a protectable mark and, of course, it is registered. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 11:06 am by Allyson Ho and Scott Schutte
In layman’s terms, this means the Court endeavors to treat class actions like any other case, refusing to craft exceptions that would make classes easier to maintain. [read post]