Search for: "Layton v. Layton" Results 121 - 137 of 137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
It appears that the reserved judgments in the important cases of PNM v Times Newspapers and Lachaux v Independent Print – which were both heard before Flood – will not be handed down this term. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 3:42 am by Terry Hart
Universal City Studios, 464 US 417, and MGM v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 6:18 am
Kaprow, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., on Wednesday, June 12, 2019 Tags: Clawbacks, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Discovery, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:12 am
Rouhandeh, and Michael Kaplan, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Saturday, April 13, 2019 Tags: Bonds, Corporate fraud, DOJ, International governance, Misconduct, Rule 144, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities litigation, Securities regulation, Volkswagen 2019 Proposed Amendments to DGCL Posted by John Mark Zeberkiewicz and Brigitte Fresco, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., on Saturday, April 13, 2019 Tags: Appraisal… [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 8:03 pm by Andrew J. Batog
Clearly, in the international community there has been a  “growing consensus against any ‘safe harbor’ for war criminals[.] [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 5:58 am by Kiersten Frenchu
Within the past two decades the prevalence of obesity in the United States has risen dramatically, enough to classify the occurrence as an epidemic.5 Obesity is attributed to 300,000 annual deaths and is associated with a long list of health effects including type 2-diabetes, hypertension, and impaired quality of life.4 Current estimates of America’s obese population include 68% of adults and 32% of children, but the factors causing this dramatic increase are not fully understood.1 However,… [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
Jeffrey Fisher, who clerked for Stevens in the 1998-99 term and is now a professor at Stanford, says, “The reason he very rarely speaks first is that he really listens to his colleagues and tries to figure out what is on their minds and tries to figure out what the swing votes care about in the case.”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
Jeffrey Fisher, who clerked for Stevens in the 1998-99 term and is now a professor at Stanford, says, “The reason he very rarely speaks first is that he really listens to his colleagues and tries to figure out what is on their minds and tries to figure out what the swing votes care about in the case.”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]