Search for: "LeBlanc v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2011, 3:59 am by Mark Zamora
(“”Sears”) (collectively “Defendants”) in the United States District Court for the Central District of California (styled Steve Chambers, Lynn Van Der Veer, David Brown, Bach-Tuyet Brown, Kevin O’Donnell, Joseph Cicchelli, Kurt Himler, Susan Milicia, Gary LeBlanc and James Cashman v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the Supreme Court accepted one more case for next term, Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:18 pm
Baker (1818) 16 U.S. 541, 545); quite recently, it determined that a fish is not a “tangible object” (United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 5:51 am by valientelaw
United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932), which is codified at section 775.021(4)(a) of the Florida Statutes, requires that each charged offense include an element the other does not.FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ V. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 12:08 pm by Hans C. Wahl, Esq.
Many laws have been passed in both the United States and the State of Florida to protect the rights of consumers. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:13 am
Duty of fair representation LeBlanc v Security Services Unit, Council 82, Appellate Division, Third Department, 278 A.D.2d 732 The LeBlanc decision illustrates some of the technical hurdles confronting members of an employee organization attempting to sue their collective bargaining agent on the grounds that it violated its duty of fair representation. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 6:46 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
She is a legend, going back to her work on the LCO treaty rights cases in Wisconsin, the LeBlanc matter in Michigan, and United States v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:30 pm
The Court observed that this conclusion accords with the general proposition, endorsed by the Second Circuit in LeBlanc v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 4:10 am by John Gregory
In Ontario College of Pharmacists v. 1724665 Ontario Inc., 2013 CanLII 13655 (ON SC), the court held that a call centre in Ontario that was acting for a company in Belize taking orders for drugs made in China for delivery to patients in the United States was carrying on the practice of pharmacy in Ontario to the degree that the Ontario regulator had jurisdiction over it. [read post]