Search for: "Leader v. State of California (1986)"
Results 1 - 20
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm
In the November 1986 elections, Democrats won control of the U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 12:18 pm
Following the US Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 3:05 pm
Kwon v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 1:52 pm
Nelson to uphold California’s “Proposition 8,” banning same-sex marriage in that state. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:00 am
Kwon v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 6:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 3:05 pm
Kwon v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:36 am
Id. at 12 (citing California v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., the owner of the copyright for the song, brought an action against Luther Campbell, the leader of the band 2 Live Crew, for copyright infringement. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:18 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
A substantially similar version of this article was initially published in Issue No. 1 2012 of the Business Law News of the California State Bar. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
” Corporate and securities law – as well as companies and their leaders acting through lobbying and politics – also have major roles to play.[9] The proposed legislation in California is both legally solid and helpful for making climate progress. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 11:05 am
” But the position of the United States government in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 5:26 pm
On any given day in the State of California, 40,000 individuals are either employed as day laborers or are seeking day labor jobs. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:08 pm
That ruling’s strength, the judge said, has been eroded by later court rulings on gay rights, and it is now “outdated.” High Tech Gays, the opinion added, was based primarily upon a 1986 Supreme Court ruling allowing states to make it a crime for gays to engage in homosexual conduct in private That decision, Bowers v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 6:03 am
United States (1986), California v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:51 am
The Justices were scheduled to consider at their Thursday private Conference the California tuition case (Martinez v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd., 1986 WL 69060, at *5-6 (N.D. [read post]