Search for: "Leah Litman"
Results 141 - 160
of 470
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2020, 4:08 pm
By Leah Litman Leah Litman is an assistant professor of law at the University of Michigan Law School and host of the podcast “Strict Scrutiny,” about the Supreme Court. *** Theodore Roosevelt called the presidency a “bully pulpit” — but President Trump takes the concept to a new level, using his office to ridicule and insult his critics and opponents. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 6:30 am
Leah Litman, Courts, The Academy, and Politics.3. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (Yale University Press 2020).Leah LitmanMark Tushnet’s Taking Back the Constitution is a tour de force. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 6:00 am
House of Representatives), Leah Litman (Michigan), Sandy Levinson (Texas), D.A. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Briefly: In a Washington Post opinion piece, Leah Litman argues that President Donald Trump’s Tuesday executive order – which seeks to exclude undocumented immigrants from the 2020 census count used to determine congressional representation – confirms that the administration’s arguments before the Supreme Court in last year’s census case, Department of Commerce v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:08 pm
” Law professor Leah Litman has this essay online at The Washington Post. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:51 am
Legal scholars, including Melissa Murray, Leah Litman, and Caroline Mala Corbin, note that June Medical actually may make abortion easier to restrict. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 6:10 pm
“How To Train Your Killer Whale”: You can access via this link today’s new installment of the “Strict Scrutiny” podcast featuring Jaime Santos and law professors Kate Shaw and Leah Litman. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 12:02 pm
Progressives’ Supreme Court Victories Will Be Fleeting By Leah Litman, Assistant Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School Leah Litman contends that, while progressives had several important wins at the Supreme Court this term, the reasoning used in those opinions—and decisions in other cases—suggest that it is conservatives who will be winning much more in the future. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 5:07 am
Nominations will be reviewed by a prize committee comprised of Professors Samuel Bray (Notre Dame), Seth Davis (Berkeley), Allison Orr Larsen (William & Mary), Marin Levy (Duke), and Leah Litman (Michigan), with the result announced at the Federal Courts section program at the 2021 AALS Annual Meeting. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 1:02 pm
University of Michigan law professor Leah Litman interviewed one of the co-founders of United for Diploma Privilege, Dr. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 5:47 pm
“Progressives’ Supreme Court Victories Will Be Fleeting; The groundwork is now in place for major conservative wins in the years ahead”: Law professor Leah Litman has this essay online at The Atlantic. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
” Leah Litman, writing for Slate, interprets Roberts’ jurisprudence this term as rejecting attempts by conservative litigators and conservative lower courts to change the law too quickly. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:57 am
” Law professor Leah Litman has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 1:21 pm
But as Leah Litman points out in this Washington Post commentary, that is wrong. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 12:52 pm
” Law professor Leah Litman has this essay online at The Washington Post. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 8:50 pm
“The Supreme Court Didn’t Have to Rely on Xenophobic Logic; But it did”: Online at The Atlantic, law professor Leah Litman has an essay that begins, “A little more than a century ago, in what are known as the Chinese Exclusion Cases, the Supreme Court said that the political branches possess sweeping powers over noncitizens who are seeking to enter the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 12:52 pm
The Supreme Court Didn’t Have to Rely on Xenophobic Logic By Leah Litman, Assistant Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School Leah Litman asserts that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 3:52 am
At Take Care, Leah Litman examines how the decision to remove U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 3:59 am
” Briefly: In op-ed for The New York Times, Leah Litman and Tonja Jacobi maintain that during the recent telephonic arguments at the Supreme Court, for which the chief justice served as timekeeper, Roberts’ “uneven application of the rules was … gendered and ideological, as interruptions have been in previous courts. [read post]
