Search for: "Leah Litman and Steve Vladeck" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2019, 3:08 pm by Howard Bashman
“Yes, the public’s perception of the Supreme Court matters”: Leah Litman, Joshua Matz, and Steve Vladeck have this essay online at The Washington Post. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:30 am
" And today at the "Take Care" blog, Leah Litman, Helen Klein Murillo, and Steve Vladeck have a post titled "The Rule of Law and the Resistance Police. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:25 am
" And at the "Take Care" blog, Steve Vladeck and Leah Litman have a post titled "How the President's Clarifying Memorandum Destroys the Case for the Entry Ban. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 11:18 am by Steve Vladeck
Steve Vladeck is a professor of law at the University of Texas School of Law. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
” At Lawfare, Steve Vladeck urges the justices to review Larrabee v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
Steve Vladeck has this blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s opinion in Wilson v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, Steve Vladeck and Leah Litman maintain that two developments on Wednesday in the entry-ban cases “de-couple the entry ban from the internal review procedures—and, in doing so, undermine (perhaps fatally) the government’s strongest arguments for the ban itself. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At Lawfare, Steve Vladeck asks whether “[a]s a normative matter (that is, without regard to historical or doctrinal foundations), … Justice Kennedy’s case against judge-made damages remedies for constitutional violations [is] actually convincing. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:25 am by Quinta Jurecic
” Responding on Take Care, Leah Litman, Helen Murillo, and Steve Vladeck take the position that the question of whether Trump’s statements are permissibly the subject of judicial analysis is a purely legal issue, entirely distinct any discomfort judges may have with the fact of Trump’s presidency. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
A recent episode of Bloomberg Law’s Cases and Controversies podcast features a conversation between law professor Steve Vladeck and “Tom Goldstein, the veteran U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Leah Litman analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Meanwhile, to the extent that the state is really making a claim that the doctors and clinics lack Article III standing, that's wrong too, as Leah Litman and Steve Vladeck explain in this SCOTUSblog essay.The standing objections are thus weak, but might it be in some sense "better" for the abortion-rights community to lose on standing than to lose on the merits? [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am by Edith Roberts
At Just Security, Steve Vladeck urges the court to grant review in two Guantanamo military commission cases, arguing that “the time has long-since passed for the Supreme Court to settle the validity of the commissions’ jurisdiction. [read post]