Search for: "Leah Litman and Steve Vladeck"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2019, 3:08 pm
“Yes, the public’s perception of the Supreme Court matters”: Leah Litman, Joshua Matz, and Steve Vladeck have this essay online at The Washington Post. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:30 am
" And today at the "Take Care" blog, Leah Litman, Helen Klein Murillo, and Steve Vladeck have a post titled "The Rule of Law and the Resistance Police. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 5:37 pm
“Message Received”: You can access today’s new installment of the “Strict Scrutiny” podcast — featuring law professors Melissa Murray, Kate Shaw, and Leah Litman, and their guest Steve Vladeck — via this link. [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:49 pm
• Leah Litman and Steve Vladeck argue discuss the constitutional rights that could be on the chopping block if the Dobbs draft becomes the Court's opinion, with the provocative headline "The Biggest Lie Conservative Defenders of Alito's Leaked Opinion Are Telling. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:25 am
" And at the "Take Care" blog, Steve Vladeck and Leah Litman have a post titled "How the President's Clarifying Memorandum Destroys the Case for the Entry Ban. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 11:18 am
Steve Vladeck is a professor of law at the University of Texas School of Law. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 11:56 am
Steve Vladeck is the A. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 4:15 am
” At Lawfare, Steve Vladeck urges the justices to review Larrabee v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 8:34 am
Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared a discussion on the National Security Law Podcast about the implications of the Russian bounty program, the Justice Department’s case against Julian Assange, and recent Supreme Court decisions, among other topics: Lester Munson shared an episode of Fault Lines in which he spoke with Jamil Jaffer, Dana Stroul and Loren Dealy Maher, National Security Institute (NSI) visiting fellow and former director of legislative affairs at the… [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:38 am
” At Take Care, Steve Vladeck and Leah Litman maintain that two developments on Wednesday in the entry-ban cases “de-couple the entry ban from the internal review procedures—and, in doing so, undermine (perhaps fatally) the government’s strongest arguments for the ban itself. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:20 am
” At Lawfare, Steve Vladeck asks whether “[a]s a normative matter (that is, without regard to historical or doctrinal foundations), … Justice Kennedy’s case against judge-made damages remedies for constitutional violations [is] actually convincing. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
” Steve Vladeck has this blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s opinion in Wilson v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:25 am
” Responding on Take Care, Leah Litman, Helen Murillo, and Steve Vladeck take the position that the question of whether Trump’s statements are permissibly the subject of judicial analysis is a purely legal issue, entirely distinct any discomfort judges may have with the fact of Trump’s presidency. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
A recent episode of Bloomberg Law’s Cases and Controversies podcast features a conversation between law professor Steve Vladeck and “Tom Goldstein, the veteran U.S. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 9:53 pm
Not Leah Litman. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
Leah Litman analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am
At Just Security, Steve Vladeck urges the court to grant review in two Guantanamo military commission cases, arguing that “the time has long-since passed for the Supreme Court to settle the validity of the commissions’ jurisdiction. [read post]
