Search for: "Lederer v. Lederer"
Results 41 - 60
of 83
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
Sources GMCR 8-K Disclosing SEC Inquiry Michelle Stacy’s Form 4 disclosing sale of GMCR stock and option Interesting Issues in Timing of Green Mountain Insider Stock Sales and Disclosure of SEC Inquiry by Sam Antar in White Collar Fraud Whistleblower alledges insider trading at GMCR by WCAX.com Green Mountain Coffee: Beware the Valley Below by Scott Crown in Seeking Alpha Green Mountain and the multi-tasking 8-K… by Michelle Leder in Footnoted Green Mountain Coffee Will Have… [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:40 am
Here is the AD decision: "To state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must allege that the attorney "failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession," and that the breach of this duty proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages (Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d 836, 837 [internal quotation marks omitted], cert denied… [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:59 am
(see e.g., Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d 836; Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428; Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008; Carmel v Lunney, 70 NY2d 169). [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:21 am
See Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d 266, 268 (I st Dept 2006) (“The failure to demonstrate proximate cause mandates the dismissal of a legal malpractice action regardless of whether the attorney was negligent. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 5:47 am
” (Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d 836, 837 [2007] [internal citations omitted].) [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:57 am
Corp. v McManus & Richter, _ AD3d _, 2024 NY Slip Op 00799, * 5 [1 st Dept 2024]). [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:25 am
In Leder v Spiegel(31 AD3d 246,267 [ 1” Dept 2006 the Appellate Division, First Department, noted that “[in order to state a cause of action for legal malpractice, the complaint must set forth three elements: the negligence of the attorney; that the negligence was the proximate cause of the loss sustained; and actual damages. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
In Gallagher v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:46 am
Lederer de Paris Fifth Ave., Inc. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 4:31 am
To state a cause of action for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must plead “the negligence of the attorney; that the negligence was the proximate cause of the loss sustained; and actual damages” (Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d 266, 267 [1st Dept 2006], a.ffd 9 NY3d 836 [2007], cert denied, 552 US 1257 [2008] [citations omitted]). [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
16th-century painting of a civil law notary, by Flemish painter Quentin MassysGlobal consensus appears to be moving steadily toward the embrace of a principle touching on "the ethical considerations which a lawyer should take into account in the field of business and human rights when advising clients. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 5:34 pm
… In Barnes v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 2:11 am
To prevail on a cause of action for legal malpractice, plaintiff must satisfy three elements: (1) the negligence of the attorney; (2) that the negligence was the proximate cause of the loss sustained; and (3) actual damages (Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d 266, 267-268, 819 N.Y.S.2d 26 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:55 am
Belated good news for her for sure.In Puello v. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 2:18 pm
The British Columbia proceeding, Boundary Museum Society v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm
See Leder v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm
See Leder v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 3:50 am
See Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d 266, 268 (I st Dept 2006) (“The failure to demonstrate proximate cause mandates the dismissal of a legal malpractice action regardles~ of whether the attorney was negligent. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:49 am
Finally, construing the pleading in the light most favorable to plaintiff, as is required on consideration of [*4]a CPLR 3211 motion to dismiss, we find that it asserts actions and omissions by defendants that support viable claims for recovery (see Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d 266 [2006], affd 9 NY3d 836 [2007], cert denied 552 US 1257 [2008]). [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 5:51 pm
From yesterday's Fairstein v. [read post]
