Search for: "Lee v. Dodge"
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
To shed light on the issue and encourage people to back our campaign for a proper ban on hunting, we have produced a powerful animation narrated by the talented actress Poppy Lee Friar which you can watch below. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:35 am
Then, in Liapes v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:24 am
Snap, Lee v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
The Regulatory Review is pleased to highlight our top regulatory essays of 2023 authored by a select number of our many expert contributors. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 9:17 am
” Cites to Perfect 10 v. ccBill, LW v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
The Emily in Paris problem: The dodge where you make the content in the country but not for the country. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:04 pm
Supreme Court holds that states lack standing to challenge immigration prioritization guidelines. _____________________________________________________________________ With Its Student Loan Decision, the Court Again Limits Agency Authority July 20, 2023 | Kate Shaw, Cardozo Law School, and Crawford Schneider, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School In Biden v. [read post]
How Has Blockchain Technology Fared in China? –from a case study of LRB to the most recent NFT cases
27 Mar 2023, 9:50 am
The market avoids using the direct translation of NFT to dodge regulatory risks. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:40 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Criminal Action No. 20-10177-PBS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm
On 12 May 2022, there were hearings in the cases of Lee -v- Brown before Collins Rice J and MPL -v- WSZ before Saini J. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 7:48 am
The Supreme Court in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:49 am
Panel 2 – Copyright Enforcement: Faye Fangfei Wang, Resolving Copyright-related Cases Over the Internet with the Assistance of Artificial Intelligence in Europe Automated notice and takedown/Content ID with appeal mechanism as an example of how the new European rules are supposed to work. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 4:32 pm
v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
” Take, for example, his statement that Burwell v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:03 am
Explaining the denial of a Rule 702 motion in terms of the availability of cross-examination is just one among several dodges that judges use to avoid fully engaging with Rule 702’s requirements.[1] Another dodge involves shifting the burden of proof on admissibility from the proponent of the challenged expert witness to the challenger. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
In my last post,[1] I praised Lee Mickus’s recent policy paper on amending Rule 702 for its persuasive force on the need for an amendment, as well as a source for helping lawyers anticipate common judicial dodges to a faithful application of the rule.[2] There are multiple dodges used by judicial dodgers, and it behooves litigants to recognize and anticipate them. [read post]
10 May 2020, 1:41 pm
Dakota District Judge Piersol, joined by Judge Lee. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:47 am
In his advocacy paper, lawyer Lee Mickus has collated and analyzed some of the more recent dodges, which will depress the spirits of anyone who believes in evidence-based decision making.[11] My resistance to reform by amendment is waning. [read post]
25 Dec 2019, 10:40 am
The Supreme Court's acceptance of Oracle v. [read post]
