Search for: "Lee v. Florida"
Results 141 - 160
of 711
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2019, 4:04 am
Lee Cty. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 2:44 pm
For example, in West v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:14 am
Decided in 2014 by the Florida U.S. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
SHIREY V. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Fowler, III (Pro Hac Vice)Luis Llamas(Florida Bar No. 89822) 201 St. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:18 am
Florida and Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 11:50 am
• Robert V. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 11:50 am
• Robert V. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 2:28 pm
By Lee Tillett, Inc., 940 F. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu) Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu) Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto (jacq.briggs@utoronto.ca)John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jowertheimer@davidson.eduLaw and Empire in the Sino-Asian Context (Harvard Law School / TBD)12:00 PM – 4:30 PMLegal History and the Persistent Power of State and Local Governments (Cambridge Room)Moderators: Brooke… [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 6:09 am
• Douglas V. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 5:39 am
See Busse v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 5:39 am
See Busse v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:49 pm
Nugent v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 8:55 pm
One village in Florida had to pay $460,000.00, it’s probably going to cost Georgia many times that to unlock their computers. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:54 am
Kondrat’yev, in which the Florida city had asked the justices to review a ruling by the U.S. [read post]