Search for: "Lee v. Illinois" Results 141 - 160 of 275
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2014, 5:58 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Case number: 10-cv-02755 (United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois) Case filed: May 4, 2010 Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 21, 2014 05/22/2014 08/20/2014 2014-48 SEC v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:31 am by John Elwood
Illinois, 13-5967, in a unanimous per curiam opinion. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am by John Elwood
Illinois, 13-5967, which this week picked up its tenth relist since the record arrived. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am by John Elwood
Illinois, 13-5967, which asks whether jeopardy attaches when a jury is sworn after the prosecution refuses to participate in the case. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 12:00 pm by Dan Ernst
Wade Was Written, which also appears in the Washington and Lee Law Review 71 (2014): 893-924. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 7:31 am
Then, in 2010, the Illinois Supreme Court brought an end to the caps in the landmark decision of Lebron v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 12:22 pm by Brenda Fulmer
Under current law, as confirmed by the United States Supreme Court in the Pliva v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 8:52 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In her very brief opinion and order in Lee v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am by Eric Goldman
Q9: Actress Jamie Lee Curtis obtained Patent #4,753,647. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
On SCOTUSblog, Ronald Collins interviews Lee Levine and Stephen Wermiel about their just published book, The Progeny: Justice William Brennan’s Fight to Save New York Times v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Proia, Freeing the Prop 8 Tape: Perry v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Orr, a suit filed last year by the ACLU and Lambda Legal challenging the constitutionality of Illinois' previous prohibition of same-sex marriage.Meanwhile, in Lee v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Consider it a replay of that old Hume v. [read post]