Search for: "Lee v. Johnson" Results 21 - 40 of 495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2010, 10:37 am by Kent Scheidegger
In the middle one, Justices Stevens and Breyer dissent with reference to their dissent in Johnson v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 11:26 am
  The Stanford team members were Rachel Lee, Erica Ross, and Patrick Nemeroff. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 7:41 am
Late last month, Representative Jerry Nadler (D-NY), along with original cosponsors Hank Johnson (D-GA), Bobby Scott (D-VA), Bill Delahunt (D-MA), Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX), Judy Chu (D-CA), Michael Michaud (D-ME), Carolyn Kilpatrick (D-MI) and Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-MI), introduced H.R. 4115, the Open Access to Courts Act of 2009. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 6:07 am
We're not the first to post on the recent defense win in Ervin v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 12:25 pm by Sung Un Kim
The Honourable Rob Nicholson [official website] for Niagara Falls, the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General of Canada made a public statement about the planned appeal in the case of Lee Carter and Hollis Johnson et al. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
From Ex parte Lee, decided last week by the Tenth District Texas Court of Appeals, in an opinion by Chief Justice Tom Gray, joined by Justices Matt Johnson and Steven Lee Smith: Allen Michael Lee is charged with one count of aggravated sexual assault of a child and two counts of sexual assault of a child. [read post]
6 May 2016, 4:10 pm by Jon Sands
Lee, No. 13-10517 (5-6-16)(Hurwitz with Bea; Ikuta dissenting). [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:00 am by Rumpole
Creech, ___ U.S. ___ (1993), relevant mitigating evidence to be disregarded, see, e.g., Johnson v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm
Any issue preclusion consequences of that decision are your own doing, and I find it implausible that you can be heard to complain about them.So I understand and appreciate Judge Lee's attempt to provide an advance viewing of his position on a topic that's not at issue in the present case but that may perhaps nonetheless arise in some cases in the future. [read post]