Search for: "Lee v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 4,859
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2023, 11:07 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Murphy, Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens) (Revisited) and Other Topics: The Seventy-Third Session of the International Law Commission International DecisionsJaemin Lee, Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
The threats are everywhere: Congress, state legislatures, the Supreme Court, internationally. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm by John A. Emmons
Anderson sat down with professors Chimène Keitner and Ingrid Wuerth to discuss oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 11:58 am by Christopher J. Walker
Lee Liberman Otis Luncheon Debate: Resolved: The Major Questions Doctrine Has No Place in Statutory Interpretation In West Virginia v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 5:53 am by Mary B. McCord
” North Carolina militia leader Michael Lee Wells testified that Three Percenter group chats included calls to start “taking out” civilians in Democratic areas, as the “only way to stop the rioting. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Fraley, Washington and Lee University School of Law, has published History of U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am by Derek T. Muller
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee… [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am by Derek T. Muller
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee… [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 10:34 am by Christopher J. Walker
Federalist Society Luncheon Debate: Resolved: The Major Questions Doctrine Has No Place in Statutory Interpretation Thursday, January 6, noon-1PM In West Virginia v. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 3:50 am by Lawrence Solum
Periods of loosening include the 1990s when the approach to standing was increasingly liberalized, exemplified by R. v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex p. [read post]