Search for: "Lee v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 5,036
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
The Conservative deputy chair Lee Anderson has apologised to a doctor after he made a “misleading” social media post about him. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 10:12 am
Burns (1976), Branti v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 7:30 am
In addition, intelligence and law enforcement agencies have increasingly used specious legal reasoning and deep pockets to buy their way around Carpenter v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 7:13 am
This case is one of them.The case is Lorefice v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
On 1 November 2023, the Supreme Court of British Columbia dismissed the claimant’s defamation claim in Lee v Black, 2023 BCSC 1920 as being without any basis in fact. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 3:01 pm
No less a figure than Tim Berners-Lee declared the following way back in 2006: Net neutrality is very important. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 12:54 am
With regard to the concerns of the SPAB [16] to [21], the Chancellor stated: “[22]. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 1:49 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Brehshiek Marquez v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Brehshiek Marquez v. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 6:39 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 6:15 pm
Co. v Campbell (538 US 408 [2003]), and Gomez v Cabatic (159 AD3d 62 [2d Dept 2018]). [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
Troops, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 5:50 am
(Of note, a new bipartisan bill introduced in September by Representatives Barbara Lee (D-CA) and Michael Burgess (R-TX), the Drone Reform Act, would achieve this.) [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 10:18 pm
From yesterday's opinion in Wayne Lee v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
Lee J held that the although the publisher believed publication of the matter was in the public interest, the belief was not reasonable in the circumstances [384]. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 5:55 am
” In re Marriage of Lees, 224 Ill. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
A notice of Saul Cornell’s research in advance of the oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 12:44 pm
Co. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 6:36 am
To state a cause of action for legal malpractice, a party must allege that “(1) the attorneywas negligent; (2) the attorney’s negligence was a proximate cause of [the party’s] losses; and (3) [the party] suffered actual damages” (RTW Retailwinds, Inc. v Colucci & Umans, 231 AD3d 509, 510 [1st Dept 2023], citing Excelsior Capitol LLC v K & L Gates LLP, 138 AD3d 492 [1st Dept 2016]). [read post]
