Search for: "Lee v. Superior Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 428
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2014, 12:40 am
Superior Court, Case No. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 5:00 am
From HG Legal Resources: A July 22, 2016 decision in New Jersey Superior Court, Lee v. [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 12:40 am
Superior Court, Case No. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 5:47 am
That impact remains with us.The case is Lee-Walker v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 4:13 pm
In People v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 8:00 am
Superior Court (Lee) (discussed here).] [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 6:20 am
The bad faith case of Berg v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 12:27 pm
For example, in Lee v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 3:27 pm
On appeal, Division III upheld the superior court's decision to allow disclosure. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 12:03 pm
Lee of the San Bernardino Superior Court will be sitting Pro Tem in Division Five until February 29, 2024Justice Hoffstadt can't resist starting off City of Norwalk v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 11:43 am
Non-Disparagement Provisions: Allowed (for Now) On May 31, 2022, the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, published its decision in Savage v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 5:00 am
Aug. 30, 2016), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court had granted an appeal on the following issue: "Whether this Court should ratify the requirements of Terletsky v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 8:59 am
In a recent trial in Los Angeles Superior Court in the matter AFS Enterprises, LLC, v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 8:31 am
Lee v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:44 am
Lee Pruett Last May, the Georgia Court of Appeals decided Hicks v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 6:38 am
There was some language in Kass v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 9:44 am
Superior Court, 237 Cal. [read post]
29 May 2014, 1:38 pm
Ellis v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 1:26 pm
Kussman of the Los Angeles Superior Court, will be sitting Pro-Tem in Division Eight until March 31, 2014Also, in the 9th Circuit's universe:Reader Kent Qian points out this one-line dissent.And see Arjmand v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 1:29 am
Lee Stowell, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. [read post]