Search for: "Lee v. Superior Court"
Results 161 - 180
of 429
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm
Lee v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:24 am
Snap, Lee v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:15 am
Supreme Court “issued a unanimous Opinion” in two consolidated cases: U.S. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 3:44 pm
First, the relator must establish that no court order governs possession of the child by asserting that no order has been rendered or that an earlier order is void or invalid to support a superior right of possession. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:47 am
Michael Lee Silverman. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:07 pm
Parker and May Lee Parker as a fall zone. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 8:28 am
Superior Court (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 297,305.) [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:52 am
In this regard, Brousseau v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 2:31 pm
See Delvoye v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 6:32 pm
Lee (oral contract); Furuya v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 2:04 pm
” Distinguishing State v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:23 am
Brekka, 581 F.3d 1127, 1130-31 (9th Cir. 2009) and Int’l Airport Centers LLC v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:05 pm
The case is pending in the San Francisco Superior Court. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
This post is by my colleagues Gail Lees, Andrew Tulumello, Chip Nierlich, Mark Whitburn and Chris Chorba. [read post]
The BASMATI saga: General Court accommodates extended passing off within Community trade mark system
3 Oct 2015, 2:58 am
Earlier this week Katfriend Nigel Urwin (Lee Bolton Monier-Williams) brought to the IPKat's attention news of a case (Tilda Riceland Private v OHMI - Siam Grains (BASMALI), T-136/14) that the General Court (GC) decided on 30 September last, and appears to have some relevant implications particularly as far as that peculiar creature of UK common law known as extended passing off is concerned.Before going into the details of the decision, what is extended passing… [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 1:07 am
Superior Court, case no. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 3:15 pm
Superior Court. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 6:30 pm
Accordingly, we remand to the Sullivan Superior Court with instructions to transfer this matter to the Howard Superior Court. [read post]
2 May 2018, 10:09 am
Seyfarth Synopsis: The California Supreme Court, in Dynamex Operations v. [read post]
