Search for: "Lee v. Superior Court" Results 161 - 180 of 372
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
 The  Supreme Court of Canada finally upped Robinson’s total award from the $2.7 million figure set by the Quebec Court of Appeal, but without restoring it fully to the $5.2 million awarded by Superior Court Judge Claude Auclair in 2009. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:37 am
Coffing Hoist Division, 528 A.2d 590 (Pa. 1987) – an exclusion later extended to compliance with mandatory government standards by the Superior Court (an appellate court in Pennsylvania) – and of a plaintiff’s comparative fault in Kimco Development Corp. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Lishan Wang, now percolating in the New Haven Superior Court. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:38 am by Morin Jacob
Superior Court (Johnson) considered the interplay between the United States Supreme Court’s 1963 decision in Brady v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:15 am
Supreme Court “issued a unanimous Opinion” in two consolidated cases:  U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
The superiority of judges as fact finders in complex scientific cases remains to be shown. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
  Several lower court decisions had done so explicitly:  Overton v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:43 am
Lee start a crime scene roster to document who entered and exited the apartment. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:21 am
P1–10–1155A (Rhode Island Superior Court 2012). [read post]
12 May 2014, 2:04 pm by Florian Mueller
A: Copyright laws differ between jurisdictions, but commentators often overstate the scope of the opinion by the Court of Justice of the EU in SAS Institute v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am by John Elwood
  In 2010 the Court issued a per curiam opinion (after calling for the record and nine relists) summarily vacating a Georgia Superior Court decision for misapplying the second (prejudice) prong of Strickland v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 1:26 pm
Kussman of the Los Angeles Superior Court, will be sitting Pro-Tem in Division Eight until March 31, 2014Also, in the 9th Circuit's universe:Reader Kent Qian points out this one-line dissent.And see Arjmand v. [read post]