Search for: "Leeder v Antonucci"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2021, 5:17 am
Plaintiff tried to use an expert’s report which summarized the estate’s account on a summary judgment opposition in Leeder v Antonucci 2021 NY Slip Op 03978 [195 AD3d 1592] June 17, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 4:23 am
Leeder v Antonucci 2019 NY Slip Op 05898 [174 AD3d 1469] July 31, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department is an example. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:05 am
Leeder v Antonucci 2019 NY Slip Op 05898 Decided on July 31, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department looks at the last of the elements – ascertainable damages, as well as examines continuous representation in a statute of limitations setting. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 4:53 am
Here, in Leeder v Antonucci 2021 NY Slip Op 03978 Decided on June 17, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department we some of both. [read post]
26 May 2023, 4:51 am
Leeder v Antonucci, 195 AD3d 1592, 1593 [4th Dept 2021]; see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:43 am
Leeder v Antonucci, 195 AD3d 1592, 1593 [4th Dept 2021]; see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:15 am
“For the continuous representation doctrine to apply to an action sounding in legal malpractice, there must be clear indicia of an ongoing, continuous, developing, and dependent relationship between the client and the attorney, which often includes an attempt by the attorney to rectify an alleged act of malpractice” (International Electron Devices [USA] LLC v Menter, Rudin & Trivelpiece, P.C., 71 AD3d at 1512-1513 [internal quotation marks, ellipsis, brackets and citations… [read post]
