Search for: "Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2019, 9:15 am by Dan Schweitzer
” The court allowed state amicus arguments in cases of that sort — such as Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:17 pm by Bona Law PC
In 2007, the Supreme Court dramatically changed the landscape when it decided Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:08 pm by Toby Heytens
Holder), and overruled earlier decisions involving antitrust (Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:12 pm by Beth Farmer
” He asserted that this would be a new development, because, although the majority cites Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:38 pm by Guest
This condition is generally based on the rule laid down by US Supreme Court in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:08 am by Jetta Sandin
On the other hand, ever since the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:12 am by Darcy Jalandoni
It contends both that the 2nd Circuit Court’s application of the per se rule to Apple’s vertical conduct conflicts with the Supreme Court’s decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:50 pm by Lyle Denniston
 The lawyers also contended that the Second Circuit ruling contradicts the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 3:02 pm by David Goldstein
Actavis, 570 U.S. __ (2013) (rule of reason applies to pharmaceutical reverse payment settlements); Leegin Creative Leather Prods., Inc. v PSKS, Inc., 551 U.S. 877 (2007) (rule of reason applies to resale price maintenance). [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 11:25 pm by Jarod Bona
In 2007, the Supreme Court dramatically changed the landscape when it decided Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 10:39 pm by Jarod Bona
The clearest example of this difference is the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:11 pm by Editorial Board
In granting summary judgment against the Sherman Act claim, the court relied on Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v PSKS, Inc., 551 U.S. (2007), to apply the rule of reason and conclude that Gorlick failed to show or explain how “the alleged agreement between a manufacturer and a distributor, concerning a product line without market dominance, causes harm to competition in the entire automotive exhaust… [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 5:11 pm by Editorial Board
In granting summary judgment against the Sherman Act claim, the court relied on Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v PSKS, Inc., 551 U.S. (2007), to apply the rule of reason and conclude that Gorlick failed to show or explain how “the alleged agreement between a manufacturer and a distributor, concerning a product line without market dominance, causes harm to competition in the entire automotive exhaust… [read post]