Search for: "Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc" Results 81 - 100 of 111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2019, 9:15 am by Dan Schweitzer
” The court allowed state amicus arguments in cases of that sort — such as Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:38 pm by Guest
This condition is generally based on the rule laid down by US Supreme Court in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 9:54 am
As this blog has discussed previously, the law surrounding resale price maintenance has been unclear ever since the Supreme Court's decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:08 pm by Toby Heytens
Holder), and overruled earlier decisions involving antitrust (Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:00 am by Carter Wood
Supreme Court's decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:32 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Park & Sons Co., 220 U.S. 373 (1911), that made minimum resale price agreements ("RPM agreements," also called "vertical price-fixing") per se illegal under the Sherman Act, in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 12:42 pm
The oral argument (transcript here) in the case of Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:08 am by Jetta Sandin
On the other hand, ever since the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:50 pm by Lyle Denniston
 The lawyers also contended that the Second Circuit ruling contradicts the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:45 pm
" In the case of Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
(Note: the defendant also prevailed in the Court's final antitrust ruling, Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 4:04 pm by John W. Arden
Supreme Court's ruling, in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc, v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:12 am by Darcy Jalandoni
It contends both that the 2nd Circuit Court’s application of the per se rule to Apple’s vertical conduct conflicts with the Supreme Court’s decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]