Search for: "Lees v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,477
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2013, 2:39 pm
For example, Lee cites Justice Grier's dissent in O'Reilly v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 8:09 am
Lee v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
(In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1382.)'" blank">U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:23 am
United States Jennings v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 12:00 pm
Now that the Supreme Court's holding in Kiobel v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 9:37 am
The PTO backlog of unexamined patent applications is less than 620,000 which is down from more than 750,000 in 2009 (a 17.3 percent decrease)… On a cynical note, I will observe that reducing the backlog will become much easier for the USPTO, as will meeting pendency goals, based upon the United States Supreme Court’s breathtaking decision in Alice v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 2:00 pm
United States Dietz v. [read post]
7 May 2016, 6:56 pm
Probably United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 12:00 pm
Oregon can never be one of the United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
In Capalungan v Lee, 2019 WL 3072139 (S.D. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:42 am
United States, which Lee says is "likely to... [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
In Lee v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 10:35 am
Lee Vail In Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 4:15 am
The nation’s highest court will once again address issues surrounding the controversial Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 10:46 am
United States is here. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 1:00 pm
United States Turner v. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 9:14 am
In my view, this was the single most important free speech case the United States Supreme Court has ever decided. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 9:14 am
In my view, this was the single most important free speech case the United States Supreme Court has ever decided. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:08 pm
The date of a judgment entered prior to July 1, 2015 is computed in accordance with the Rules in effect when the judgment was entered.Turning next to relevant caselaw, the court cited its prior discussion (in Hiob v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 9:19 am
United States v. [read post]
