Search for: "Legal Writing Prof"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,946
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2020, 2:12 am
To fill this gap, Prof. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 12:40 pm
Legal Writing Inst. 23 (2020). [read post]
21 May 2020, 6:30 am
No doubt I shall write more about these last two books on another occasion. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
” The editorial board of The Wall Street Journal writes that “Mr. [read post]
6 May 2020, 11:53 am
Program coordinator: Prof. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:40 am
Dean Humphrey has been the first professor from Texas Tech Law to be elected to the national board of directors of the Legal Writing Institute (LWI). [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am
At the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Ruthann Robson notes that “the methodology for determining what level of scrutiny should be applied in Second Amendment challenges remains unresolved by the Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 3:59 am
” At the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Ruthann Robson writes that “the Justices’ various opinions discussing stare decisis might be read to portend larger developments. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 9:24 am
Many thanks to Steve Lubet for inviting us to write about our new essay, “The Right to Unmarry: A Proposal,” which we posted to SSRN on April 2. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
The call is open to everyone, and we know that some legal writing profs have expertise in this area. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 10:52 am
The first few weeks of Legal Research and Writing I were spent learning how to use reporters—you know, those dusty books in the library? [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:53 pm
Legal Writing for Legal Readers. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:53 pm
Legal Writing for Legal Readers. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 11:05 am
& Prof. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
& Prof. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
The CRT is the world’s most effective legal system innovation. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 2:48 pm
Dan Currell‘s piece at Legal Evolution (thanks to Prof. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:45 am
” At the Reproductive Rights Prof Blog, Cynthia Soohoo writes that questioning at the argument “suggested that a majority of justices wished to focus on the very narrow question of how lower courts should apply [a recent precedent] to admitting privilege laws rather than to revisit the Court’s abortion jurisprudence. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:51 am
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser writes that Seila Law v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 5:52 am
Prof. [read post]
