Search for: "Lehr v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 56
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 1:05 am by Frank Cranmer
Ron Hubbard/Scientology” [Schutzerklärung in Bezug auf die Lehre von L. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 7:07 am by Holly Brezee
By: Michael Lehr Ready – Set – Shift: NCAA’s NIL Overhaul NCAA Student-Athletes MAY Now Be Able to Monetize Their Name, Image, and Likeness | Part 1 Recently, in NCAA v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Vacuum Corp., 186 AD3d 1094 [4th Dept 2020] [“By filing that election form, Lehr—who admitted that it was his signature on the form—[is] thereby estopped from denying Rizzo’s ownership interest”]; and PH-105 Realty Corp v Elayaan, 183 AD3d 492 [1st Dept 2020] [“The court improvidently exercised its discretion in failing to apply the doctrine of ‘tax estoppel. [read post]
The decision joins the lone case from the Pennsylvania state court system on the issue, Palmiter v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 8:02 am by admin
Decision issued September 8, 2020: “Goren v Barnett” — “From 2010 to approximately 2013, the law firm of Amstein & Lehr LLP (Arnstein & Lehr) represented the Regional Center as securities counsel in various matters related to its EB-5 program administered by the United States Citizen and Immigration Services. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 2:32 pm by Olivia Cross
The Supreme Court stated this conclusion nearly one hundred years ago in Local Loan Co. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 2:32 pm by Olivia Cross
The Supreme Court stated this conclusion nearly one hundred years ago in Local Loan Co. v. [read post]
Loyalty Oath On Friday, December 3, Kia’s legal counsel and Jackson asked Gogel to sign a document stating she would “not discuss [her] EEOC charge or similar claims against [Kia] with Team Members and not use [her] position to solicit or influence Team Members to make claims against [Kia]. [read post]