Search for: "Lejeune v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2022, 12:15 pm by Pete Strom
In part, this was due to the Feres Doctrine (Feres v. the United States, 340 U.S. 135), which prohibits individuals from filing a lawsuit or lawsuit based on injuries during their service. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:14 pm by Kate Howard
Lejeune 16-552 Issue: Whether this court should grant certiorari to resolve the conflict among federal and state courts on whether failure to advise a pleading defendant of one of the three “Boykin v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:35 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  Pvt Law’s defense counsel are LtCol John Baker — of United States v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:56 am by Scott Andrews
LeJeune, 95-0053 (La.2/28/96), 668 So.2d 347, 351; and Orgeron v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
" The Waldburger decision imperiled toxic tort lawsuits that were filed against the United States on behalf of many plaintiffs who alleged that the drinking water at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina was contaminated. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 7:13 pm by Zachary Spilman
On Monday, CAAF will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 11:17 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Given the Court's astonishing and appalling creation of a constitutional right to lie about receiving a medal of valor in United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 5:35 am by Phil Cave has further reporting on United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 5:31 am by Viking
  And here for some additional context is a link to CAAFLog on United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:39 am by Viking
CBS Miami reports that the accused and appellant in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 7:08 am by Viking
North County Times is reporting the indefinite delay of United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
In a post at the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen has a brief overview of Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 6:18 am
”The Court contrasted Plaintiff’s efforts with the company in LeJeune v.Coin Acceptors, Inc., 381 Md. 288, 310-11, 849 A.2d 451, 464-65 (2004), which did not want its customers disclosing its pricing with other customers because it used a “tiered pricing scheme”. [read post]