Search for: "Lenz. Universal Music Corp" Results 1 - 20 of 75
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2020, 10:56 am by Evan Brown
Universal Music Corp., 815 F.3d 1145 (9th Cir. 2016)), the court held that having a “good faith belief” that certain content infringes requires that the copyright holder, before sending a takedown notice, consider if the potential infringement is a fair use. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 8:17 am by Eric Goldman
Universal Music * 512(f) Plaintiff Can’t Get Discovery to Back Up His Allegations of Bogus Takedowns–Ouellette v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 8:00 am by Adam Faderewski
Universal Music Corp. drastically changed the landscape of digital music. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 6:01 am by Terry Hart
In Lenz v Universal Music Corp (the “dancing baby” case), the Ninth Circuit held that the standard for holding a notice sender liable under §512(f)(1) is whether she lacked a subjective good faith belief that a use is not authorized.2801 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 2015). [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
Universal Music Corp., a case examining the circumstances by which copyright holders can get into trouble when issuing takedown notices. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
Universal Music Corp., 16-217, the famous “dancing baby” case. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 6:50 am by Aurora Barnes
Universal Music Corp. 16-217 Issue: Whether the U.S. [read post]
Universal Music Corp., the sender of a takedown notice must have a subjective belief that material related to a notice is not fair use. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
The petition of the day is: Lenz v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 8:18 am
Universal Music Corp.: Ninth Circuit Requires Analysis of Fair Use Before Issuing of Takedown Notices. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 7:50 am by Eric Goldman
Universal Music Corp., 801 F.3d 1126, 1132-33 (9th Cir. 2015) (holding that the DMCA requires copyright owners to consider fair use before issuing a takedown notice under § 512). [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 9:23 am by Harold O'Grady
Universal Music Corp., 801 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 2015). [read post]
Universal Music Corp., 801 F.3d 1126 (2015), a.k.a. the “dancing baby case,” in which the appeals court held that under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), copyright holders have a “duty to consider—in good faith and prior to sending a takedown notification—whether allegedly infringing material constitutes fair use. [read post]