Search for: "Leone v. Leone" Results 341 - 360 of 1,474
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2018, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
., LLC. v Rivkin Radler LLP,  .2018 NY Slip Op 32913(U)  November 13, 2018 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 505978/18 Judge: Leon Ruchelsman is an example of what happens when a doctor to doctor business sale goes wrong. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 8:00 am by Adam Faderewski
Gordon Simpson reported to Camp Leon Springs, First Officers’ Training Camp, in May 1917. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 7:35 am by ASAD KHAN
Since he was aged 19, in principle AP qualified for leave to remain under rule 276ADE(1)(v) and it was thus possible to dispose of the appeal by agreement failing which it fell to be considered in accordance with the law stated in the court’s judgment without passing an order. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 4:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A slight exaggeration, but in 195 Hawthorne Partners, LLC. v Thompson  2018 NY Slip Op 32804(U)  October 30, 2018  Supreme Court, Kings County  Docket Number: 506136/18 Judge: Leon Ruchelsman there are pages and pages of discussion of a back-and-forth transfer, deeds, mortgages, foreclosures of what must be a valuable property. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 4:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Bluth is the rare case in which the solemn statements of Leon v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 Co. of New York, 98 NY 314, 326 [2002]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 1994]). [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 5:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88). [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 12:50 pm by Dennis Crouch
  I will note that the same question is also presented in the pending petition in Leon Stambler v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 2:30 am by Lyle Denniston
  In December 1970, the Court split 5-to-4 in the case of Oregon v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 4:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Even as amplified by the plaintiff’s affidavit and supporting evidence, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83), the complaint failed to allege that the defendants acted “with intent to deceive the court or any party” (Judiciary Law § 487[1]; see Fleyshman v Suckle & Schlesinger, PLLC, 91 AD3d 591, 592-593; Jaroslawicz v Cohen, 12 AD3d 160, 160-161). [read post]