Search for: "Leslie Griffin" Results 61 - 80 of 179
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Amy Howe
 A preview comes from Bill Mears of Fox News, with commentary from Leslie Griffin at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Greg Lipper at Bill of Health Blog and Doug Laycock in The Washington Post. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Amy Howe
  Coverage comes from Bill Mears and Fox News, while Leslie Griffin previews the case at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, arguing that, if the Court were to “rule that courts must defer to such bans, it will certainly have profound implications for women’s health and safety. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 7:16 am by Amy Howe
  At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Leslie Shoebotham concludes that, although the ruling “is a broad decision with constitutional implications that extend beyond its immediate application,” its “scope remains to be seen. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 7:11 am by Scott Michelman
So far, the Symposium includes these pieces: 12.16.15 Helen Alvare: Let’s hope we get a “compelling state interest” analysis this time around12.16.15 Leslie Griffin: The missing interest in the contraceptive mandate cases — Catholic women12.15.15 Erin Morrow Hawley: Administrative law lessons from King v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 5:43 am by Amy Howe
In the wake of last week’s announcement that the Court will review the challenges by several religious non-profits to the Affordable Care Act’s birth-control mandate, Leslie Griffin discusses the cases at ACSblog, arguing that they “will test just how deferential the Court intends to be toward religious plaintiffs who allege a substantial burden on their religion. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 2:33 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary comes from Leslie Griffin of Hamilton and Griffin on Rights and Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 6:40 am by Amy Howe
”  And at ACSblog, Leslie Griffin suggests that the Court’s choice of cases “may signal just how far the Court is ready to go in the name of religious freedom. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 5:02 am by Amy Howe
  Coverage comes from NPR’s Nina Totenberg, with commentary from Leslie Shoebotham at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 3:45 am by Amy Howe
  In The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro reports on a study indicating that “[f]ewer juveniles are being sentenced to life in prison without parole,” while Leslie Shoebotham has an overview of the case at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Flake, Bearing Burdens: Religious Accommodations that Adversely Affect Coworker Morale, 76 Ohio State Law Journal 169-216 (2015).Leslie C. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 3:09 pm by Mark Graber
    Part IV’s essays on “Rights” (Julie Novkov, James Fleming and Linda McClain, Jedediah Purdy, Leslie Goldstein, Girardeau Spann, Dale Carpenter, Gerald Neuman, Winnifred Fallers Sullivan, Stephen Feldman, Carole Steiker, Paul Halliday, Matthew Fletcher, Emily Zackin, Saul Cornell) sharply differentiate this Handbookfrom The Federalist and the Constitution of 1789. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary comes from Leslie Griffin at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, James Gottry at The Hill, Thomas Berg at America, Gregory Lipper at casetext, Zac Bears at The Double Standard, David Fontana at Slate, Jessica Mason Pieklo at RH Reality Check, Robert Tuttle and Ira Lupu at Cornerstone, Elizabeth Wydra at Reuters, Paul Horwitz and Howard Wasserman (in three posts) at PrawfsBlawg, and Ian Millhiser at Think Progress. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:45 am by Amy Howe
  At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Leslie Shoebotham analyzes the opinion, which she describes as “more than a hotel ordinance case,” while at Dorf on Law Michael Dorf suggests that there is a logical tension between Justice Sotomayor’s majority opinion in Patel and her dissent in Horne v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am by Amy Howe
” At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Malvina Halberstam discusses the Court’s recent decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 7:55 am by Amy Howe
At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Leslie Shoebotham argues that the Court’s dismissal of the first question presented in the case, about whether the Americans with Disabilities Act required the officers to provide accommodations in scenarios like this, left “San Francisco in the position of having secured what had to be . . . an incredibly embarrassing win. [read post]
3 May 2015, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Professor Hamilton blogs at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 2:42 am by Amy Howe
Commentary comes from Lisa Keen at the Keen News Service, Leslie Griffin at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Noah Novogrodsky at the Human Rights at Home Blog, Bill Blum at TruthDig, Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Carl Esbeck at The Public Discourse, Ryan Anderson at The Daily Signal and USA Today, from Mark Strasser at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, and Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:42 am by Amy Howe
”  Commentary comes from Leslie Griffin at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, David Gans at the Detroit Free Press, Gene Schaerr at the National Review’s Bench Memos and The Daily Signal, Dawn Stefanowicz at The Public Discourse, Patrick Fagan at The Stream, and Kenneth Jost at Jost on Justice. [read post]