Search for: "Leslie Griffin"
Results 121 - 140
of 193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2014, 4:46 am
Other commentary and analysis of MacLean come from Leslie Griffin at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights and from R. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:39 am
At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Leslie Griffin discusses the amicus brief that she filed in a case (subsequently dismissed) involving the availability of a First Amendment defense for religious organizations in lawsuits filed by children who were victims of sexual abuse. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:31 am
At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Leslie Griffin and Marci Hamilton list their “top ten” objections to the regulations promulgated by the Department of Health and Human Services in the wake of last Term’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 5:11 am
Leslie A. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am
., LPA, Cincinnati How to Simplify Valuation in the Courtroom - Leslie A. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:29 am
North Carolina also continues at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, where Leslie Shoebotham has a detailed analysis; Daniel Hensel weighs in at Article 8. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 6:13 am
At Cornerstone, the blog of the Berkley Center’s Religious Freedom Restoration Project, Leslie Griffin criticizes the Court’s decisions in Thomas v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:04 am
In a three-part series at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights (here, here, and here), Leslie Griffin cites Town of Greece and Hobby Lobby as evidence that the Court’s religious make-up “makes a difference,” because the “opinions suggest the Justices are influenced by their religious worldviews in interpreting religion and the Constitution. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 7:05 am
” At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Leslie Griffin and Marci Hamilton provide a “top ten” list of “things to love, like, and hate” about the Ginsburg dissent, while in an op-ed for the Boston Globe Kent Greenfield contends that Justice Anthony Kennedy “should have listened” to Ginsburg rather than Justice Samuel Alito, the author of the majority opinion – who, Greenfield argues, “use[d] claims of modesty to mask… [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:44 pm
Luchenitser at ACSblog; Sarah Warbelow at ACSblog; Daniel Fisher of Forbes; Ilya Shapiro of the Cato Institute; and Marci Hamilton and Leslie Griffin who wrote three articles on the case at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm
Connecticut, as Leslie Griffin argues here. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 4:58 am
Commentary comes from Noah Feldman for Bloomberg View, Leslie Griffin at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Sheldon Nahmod at Nahmod Law, Hera Arsen at the Ogletree Deakins blog, and Scott Oswald at Law360 (registration required). [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:33 am
At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Leslie Griffin contends that Justice Scalia’s dissent from the denial of review in the case “was not really about” the Court’s recent decision in Town of Greece v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:43 am
Briefly: At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Leslie Griffin summarizes some of the “fun facts” that emerged from last week’s release of documents from the Clinton White House related to (as relevant here) the nominations of Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:19 am
” At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Leslie Griffin weighs in on Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:11 am
Commentary on the case comes from Noah Feldman of Bloomberg View, Ruthann Robson at Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Christopher Schmidt of ISCOTUSnow (video), Leslie Griffin at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Walter Olson at Secular Right, and Alex J. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:41 am
Commentary on the cases comes from Marci Hamilton and Leslie Griffin, in a series of posts at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Damon Root at Reason.com, Nicholas Alexiou at ACSblog, and Judith E. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Leslie C. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 5:05 pm
Griffin (William S. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:17 am
” At ACSblog, Leslie Griffin discusses both the argument (made by, among others, now-retired Justice John Paul Stevens) that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act violates the Establishment Clause and the effect of this argument on the pending challenges to the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive mandate. [read post]
