Search for: "Lester v. Sullivan"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2011, 10:41 am
In New York Times v. [read post]
Update: Sex, Drugs, and 3000 Billable HoursDefendant law firm moves to strike 'scandalous' material.
18 Dec 2009, 7:08 am
The case of Levy v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 6:55 am
It was strongly supported by Libel Reform campaigners – who nevertheless remained unhappy at the absence of a “New York Times v Sullivan” libel defence. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:05 pm
While Bond v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm
Moreover, given the recent approach of the Canadian Court of Appeal in Paulsson v. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
The judge in the hoax, by the way, was Lester Bruce Sullivan, aka, L.B. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:17 am
’ Sullivan v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 8:34 am
Vance and Trump v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
S. 231, 249 (1996); Sullivan v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:58 am
Wiseman v Sullivan. 4. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
We know from cases such as Mosley, McKennit v Ash and Naomi Campell that it covers the publication of information that is obviously private, such as that pertaining to health, medical treatment, sexual life, private finance and family life. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
Lord Fowler criticised the government’s plans for a media regulator backed by Royal Charter, while Lord Lester was concerned about Lord Justice Leveson’s suggestion to extend the law on exemplary damages by Act of Parliament. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 4:08 pm
Mahmood, Constitutional Forum, Centre for Constitutional Studies, Forthcoming ‘Newspaper Libel: With Special Emphasis on Indian Case Law’, Nayan Banerjee, National Law School of India University (NLSIU) ‘Defamation Outside Reputation: Proposals for the Reform of English Law‘, Eric Descheemaeker, University of Edinburgh – School of Law, U. of Edinburgh School of Law Working Paper No. 2011/41 ‘New York Times Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:22 am
Kostan Nechyporenko and Tim Lester report for CNN. [read post]
