Search for: "Levi v. Mississippi State Bar"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
Mississippi lawmakers are proposing a law (.pdf) that would cut off all public access to state records on people who carry concealed firearms. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
Mississippi lawmakers are proposing a law (.pdf) that would cut off all public access to state records on people who carry concealed firearms. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:35 pm
Levy, below. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am
Tex. 2005) (Jack, J.)). [9] Mississippi Valley Silica Co. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
App. 1991), the court barred pharmacist claims.KentuckyHyman & Armstrong, P.S.C. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am
Under Article I of the Constitution as originally ratified, Congress could only levy “direct taxes” if such taxes were “apportioned among the several States,” meaning in proportion to their populations. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 2:45 am
Thirty states levy their own lodging taxes, but a greater number of states give their local governments the authority to levy tourism taxes on meals, lodging, rooms, and other tourism-related transactions.[5] In these cases, the state sets parameters for what can be taxed, and localities can typically choose to levy the tax after presenting the question to voters. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
., et al. v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 2:13 am
http://j.st/pQV United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
(a) Three states levy mandatory, statewide, local add-on sales taxes at the state level: California (1.25%), Utah (1.25%), and Virginia (1%). [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:07 am
Ins. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 2:00 pm
Supreme Court Is Likely to Uphold State Powers in Some Way The pending South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
"[16] But Claiborne Hardware had no occasion to decide whether a person's not dealing with someone based on that someone's race was itself protected by the First Amendment, because it was clear that Mississippi law did not prohibit such private choices not to deal.[17] Under Mississippi law, whites could generally refuse to deal with blacks, and blacks could refuse to deal with whites. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
As many LHB readers are aware, the Law and Society Association hosts "Collaborative Research Networks" that sponsors panels for its annual meeting. [read post]
