Search for: "Levinson v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 192
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2007, 9:35 pm
As did Justice Story: A]s a frame or fundamental law of government, [t]he constitution of the United States is to receive a reasonable interpretation of its language, and its powers, keeping in view the objects and purposes, for which those powers were conferred. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 9:00 pm
The Court’s answer to this question could change the face of securities litigation in the United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 9:00 pm
The Court’s answer to this question could change the face of securities litigation in the United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:02 am by Broc Romanek
We have started posting the hordes of memos in our “Securities Litigation” Practice Area, but here’s analysis from Skadden: The Supreme Court of the United States today in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Starger, A Visual Guide to United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:48 am
United States and Black v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 2:28 pm
The Constitution of the United States, supporters profess, is not really as bad as Levinson would have us believe. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am by Marissa Miller
Broad coverage of the same-sex marriage cases, United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 8:37 am by Lawrence Solum
Evans’s understanding of equality in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:33 pm by Jonathan Moss
United States, 406 U.S. 128 (1972), applied; (2) determining, alternatively, that the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance set forth in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988) (4 justice majority of 7-justice court).  [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:02 am by Randy Barnett
And consequently, whenever nine, or rather ten States, were united in the desire of a particular amendment, that amendment must infallibly take place.” [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 10:57 am by Mark Graber
  We discuss whether courts made the correct decision in such cases as Windsor v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm by Tomiko Brown-Nagin
United States, are consistently cited in Supreme Court opinions, in constitutional law casebooks, and at confirmation hearings as prime examples of weak constitutional analysis. .... [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 5:32 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas recently denied certification of a putative securities law class after finding that plaintiff failed to put forth actual facts showing adequacy and predominance, as required to satisfy the “stringent standards” of Rule 23 pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decisions in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]