Search for: "Levy v. Levy"
Results 141 - 160
of 3,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2018, 6:50 am
” Houghton v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:10 am
The hearing officer properly admitted into evidence time sheets indicating the dates and times Levi was late to work.2. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
In Case of Klein and Others v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 3:16 am
Levy in UMG v. [read post]
13 May 2007, 6:05 am
(Riverside HA v White and another [2007] UKHL 20) . [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 3:30 pm
The ruling came in EC Term of Years Trust v. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 2:23 am
Office of Fair Trading v Abbey National plc and others [2009] UKSC 6; [2009] WLR (D) 341 "Charges levied by banks in respect of unauthorised overdrafts were part of a 'package' of services and consideration and their fairness was exempt from review under reg 6(2)(b) of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:18 pm
A unanimous Supreme Court of Missouri last week ruled in Dujakovich v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:48 am
The Court of Appeals does not see it that way.The case is Harwe v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 4:40 am
In UMG v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 8:24 am
Marranca v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 5:13 am
In response, Laing sent Levy $1000, which Levy rejected. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 1:22 am
Pirelli Cable Holding NV and Others v Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Court of Appeal “Where the United Kingdom had not levied corporation tax on the dividend paid by a UK subsidiary to a parent resident in The Netherlands or Italy, the UK tax authorities would not assume responsibility for eliminating double taxation. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 2:18 am
Office of Fair Trading v Abbey National plc and Others Supreme Court "Charges levied by banks on personal current account customers in respect of unauthorised overdrafts were part of a package of consideration for the package of banking services provided and accordingly their fairness was exempt from review by the Office of Fair Trading. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 5:07 am
In American Atheists, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:49 pm
This is the case I blogged about Tuesday; Paul Alan Levy’s post discusses the case in much more detail — if you’re interested in trademark law and free speech, check it out. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 2:11 am
Pirelli Cable Holding NV and others v Commissioners for Revenue and Customs [2008] EWCA Civ 70; [2008] WLR (D) 48 “The United Kingdom tax authorities had not assumed responsibility for eliminating double taxation on the dividend paid by a UK subsidiary to a parent resident in the Netherlands or Italy in circumstances where the UK had not levied corporation tax on the dividend. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 4:59 am
Internal Revenue Code § 6334 discusses property exempt from an IRS levy. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
In NFIB v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 9:30 am
(Liebler v. [read post]
