Search for: "Levy v. Parker"
Results 1 - 20
of 66
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 4:00 am
In the words of my fellow graduating classmates, Casey Caines and Scott Parker, in order “for us to reconcile Canada’s dark history, everyone has to be involved. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 9:00 pm
Goquen, 415 U.S. 566, 572–73 (1974); Parker v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 7:07 am
” It’s Time to Prepare More Seriously for the Next. by Nikita Lalwani (@nikitaalalwani), Alasdair Phillips-Robins (@alasdairpr) and Sam Winter Levy (@SamWinterLevy) (June 15, 2021) The U.S. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 7:02 am
Constitutional limits on statutory damages, including under NYGBL Almost twenty years ago, the Second Circuit in Parker v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 9:34 am
Maître Audet, the Board’s General Counsel, noted some possible questions arising from the pending SCC York University v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 7:22 pm
Given how effective the Department has been at collecting unemployment debts and the tools available to it — offsets against unemployment benefits, interception of tax refunds, liens against real estate and cars, wage garnishments, levies of bank accounts, and re-payment plans — debt collection by the Department of Revenue adds unnecessary layers and additional fees. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 8:05 pm
Although the Supreme Court eventually upheld Levy's conviction in Parker v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 8:05 pm
Although the Supreme Court eventually upheld Levy's conviction in Parker v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am
This current Copyright Board “2.0” is the 1989 replacement for Canada’s then 53-year-old internationally admired and exemplary Copyright Appeal Board “1.0”, which established in 1936 as a result of the legendary 1935 report of the Parker Commission.The Copyright Appeal Board consisted of a judge and two public servants, all of whom served part time. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm
Here is the provision:Fair and equitable66.501 The Board shall fix royalty and levy rates and any related terms and conditions under this Act that are fair and equitable, in consideration of(a) what would have been agreed upon between a willing buyer and a willing seller acting in a competitive market with all relevant information, at arm’s length and free of external constraints;(b) the public interest;(c) any regulation made under subsection 66.91(1);… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
Maurer notes that in one case (U.S. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 5:00 am
The final two months of 2018 have been a remarkably eventful period for observers of American civil-military relations—even for the Trump administration. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 1:23 pm
However, in the Access Copyright v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 1:49 pm
Has the permissive language of “may” referred to the in the SCC decision in CBC v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:21 am
Roe v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
Under a theory derived from Marbury v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 7:40 am
Moreover, in Parker v. [read post]
