Search for: "Levy v. Superior Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
Superior Court (2011) 51 Cal.4th 310), misappropriation (e.g., Glue-Fold, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:44 am
Our friend and colleague Marius Adomnica (Gratl & Company) has written this good case note on the recent Tim Hortons class action case in Ontario: The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released its reasons striking the Plaintiffs’ claim in Fairview Donut Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 12:05 pm
Plaintiffs alleged that the funds were exempt from levy because they social security and pension benefits; a California Superior Court agreed and ordered the funds released, id. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:06 pm
This was seen in R. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 4:20 pm
In sum, the court allowed the plaintiff to levy execution on the home involved in order to satisfy the judgment obtained in the Superior Court. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 11:20 am
That is what the court said in the Delfino case that Professor Goldman mentions (Delfino v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 7:13 am
In a five-page opinion, Hendricks County Superior Court Judge Robert W. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:59 pm
Courts of Appeals Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/currentcta.htmCases featured:Fond Du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 3:32 am
Superior Court. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 7:13 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 7:02 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 3:00 pm
Superior Court (San Diego Best Builders, Inc.) (1983) 150 Cal.App.3d 140, 145. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 1:00 pm
Superior), 13 U.S.P.Q.2d 1497, 17 Media L. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
VA084675) APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
Montminy, 2014 QCCS 2672 the Québec Superior Court had occasion to revisit these issues from in Alie v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 9:15 am
Consumer Reviews * Eugene Volokh and Paul Levy: Dozens of suspicious court cases, with missing defendants, aim at getting web pages taken down or deindexed. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 10:02 am
Superior Court, S157001, a case that could limit plaintiffs' ability to challenge insurers under the Consumers Legal Remedies Act. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 9:38 am
Instead, citing Middlesex County v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
Under a theory derived from Marbury v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:07 am
These are the first decisions in a wave of closely watched litigation challenges in California following the California Supreme Court’s August 2017 opinion in Cannabis Coalition v. [read post]
