Search for: "Lewis v. Davis"
Results 61 - 80
of 329
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2020, 7:09 am
In Sanchez v. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 7:09 am
In Sanchez v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:44 am
Jefferson Davis Parish Board of Review, No. 2020-C000200. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:44 am
Jefferson Davis Parish Board of Review, No. 2020-C000200. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Davis of Illinois and then-Chairman of the Subcommittee on Oversight, the late John Lewis of Georgia, issued a joint report. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:32 am
Davis, and NLRB v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:01 pm
FEC, Davis v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 6:02 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
IPSO has published one ruling since our last Round Up: 05869-19 Begum V The Daily Mirror, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), 6 Children (2018), Breach- sanction: publication of correction Recent Judgments On 8 April 2020 Warby J handed down judgment in Birmingham City Council v Afsar (No.4) [2020] EWHC 864 (QB). [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 4:47 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 09541-19 Brown v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 07929-19 Dunn v Liverpool Echo,1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), 14 Confidential sources (2019), 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuges (2019), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication 03690-19 Davies v The Jewish Chronicle,1 Accuracy (2018). [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 7:18 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
Such hearing shall only be held if:(i) the person is related to the child as described under paragraph (a), (b), or (c) of subdivision three of section four hundred fifty-eight-a of the social services law;(ii) the child has been temporarily removed under this part, or placed pursuant to section one thousand fifty-five of this article, and placed in non-relative foster care;(iii) the relative indicates a willingness to become the foster parent for such child and has not refused previously to be… [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
of Texas at Austin 1.18 $106,598 $90,100 V&erbilt Univ. 1.19 $129,030 $108,800 Univ. of Arkansas 1.19 $61,500 $51,700 Mitchell Hamline Sch. of Law 1.21 $64,429 $53,200 Univ. of California-Los Angeles 1.26 $121,453 $96,600 Univ. of North Dakota 1.26 $61,500 $48,800 Univ. of Kansas 1.27 $66,415 $52,100 Univ. of Kentucky 1.28 $69,860 $54,400 Univ. of Mississippi 1.32 $64,300 $48,700 The Univ. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
The Emerson defendants and the Greenberg Traurig defendants established that this action was without any reasonable basis in law or fact and that the primary purpose in commencing this action was to harass them (see Baxter v Javier, 109 AD3d 493, 495; Zysk v Kaufman, Borgeest & Ryan, LLP, 53 AD3d 482, 483; Nyitray v New York Athletic Club in City of N.Y., 274 AD2d 326, 327; Matter of Entertainment Partners Group v Davis, 198 AD2d 63,… [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Yet Brown v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court case (Michigan v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 5:39 am
Serio, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Tuesday, September 3, 2019 Tags: Appraisal rights, Delaware cases, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm
On 16 and 17 July 2019 the Court of Appeal (Sharp P, Vos C and Davis LJ) heard the appeal against the judgment of Warby J in the case of Lloyd v Google LLC. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
This post was authored by Megan Lewis. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
This post was authored by Megan Lewis. [read post]
