Search for: "Lewis v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 302
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2008, 5:29 am
A dude with the last name of "Lewis" is convicted of oral copulation with a minor under the age of 18. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 7:58 am by John Steele
Superior Court, disagreeing with existing California case law in Nacht & Lewis Architects, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 10:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Cert stage briefs: Petition for Writ of Certiorari Cert opposition Cert State Reply Connecticut Supreme Court materials: Ct SCT Opinion Appellant Brief Appellee Brief Reply Other materials: Superior Court Opinion Link to Mohegan tort claims statute [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 1:39 pm
I wonder why it is that I find myself agreeing with the California Supreme Court more than perhaps many other courts? [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:33 pm
 Unlike actual medical records, which are legitimately private.So holds the California Court of Appeal. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:17 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Written by Lewis Waring, Paralegal and student-at-law, Editor, First Reference In Stress-Crete Limited v Harriman, 2019 ONSC 2773 (“Stress-Crete”), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (“the Court”) partially granted an injunction to an employer against its former employee, upholding two out of three restrictive covenants present in the parties’ employment contract. [read post]
16 May 2022, 1:28 pm
Following a lengthy trial, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis has found that California's female director quota law violates the Equal Protection Clause of the California Constitution. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 12:20 am by Robin Stewart
Case preview: Rakusen v Jepson – Rent Repayment Orders (RROs) and superior landlords in the Court of Appeal Next month the Court of Appeal will hear an appeal from a landlord in a rent repayment order case, Rakusen v Jepson. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:29 pm by site admin
Vladeck, National Security and Bivens After Iqbal, 14 Lewis & Clark Law Review 255 (2010) Given the significance of the Supreme Court’s holding vis-a-vis pleading standards in Ashcroft v. [read post]