Search for: "Lewis v. Superior Court" Results 61 - 80 of 333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2020, 8:04 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
O’Reilly v IMAX Corporation, 2019 ONCA 991, the Court of Appeal for Ontario (“ONCA”) awarded a former president of IMAX two years of severance after the court agreed with the Ontario Superior Court of Justice’s ruling that he had been wrongfully dismissed. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 6:53 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
By Lewis Waring, Paralegal, Studen-at-Law, Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 4:44 pm by The Recorder
[Kate Moser]Workers at 24 Hour Fitness sued (.pdf) the company today in Alameda County Superior Court for allegedly discriminating against them on the basis of race, color, national origin and gender. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:42 am by Steven G. Pearl
The trial court (Orange County Superior, Judge Sheila Fell) entered judgment for the company, finding that it had no obligation to indemnify Chen. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 3:22 pm by Bruce Nye
Amaral (1973) 31 Cal.App.3d 814 (verbatim statements generally discoverable) and Nacht & Lewis Architects, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 7:57 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Written by Lewis Waring, Paralegal, Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania vacated the Superior Court’s ruling and remanded the case back to the Superior Court for reconsideration.[11]  Perhaps most importantly, the Supreme Court rejected the Superior Court’s suggestion that the rule of capture does not apply to hydraulic fracturing due to the fact that hydraulic fracturing is an artificial means to stimulate production. [read post]