Search for: "Lewis v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 1,251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2018, 11:37 am by Walter Olson
Lewis (5/21/18) NLRA won'tStop solo arbitrationIf parties agreedhttps://t.co/G6jq2VzVfv — Supreme Court Haiku (@SupremeHaiku) May 21, 2018 #SCOTUS #haiku Carpenter v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:11 am by Zachary D Spilman
This week at CAAF: CAAF will hear oral argument in two cases this week, both on Wednesday, March 27, 2019, beginning at 9:30: United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 8:19 am
Oregon, which concerned the rights under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations of foreign nationals arrested in the United States. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm by Sean Toomey
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm by Sean Toomey
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:37 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The Government’s argument: No one seemed all that happy with the United States’ official immunit [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:44 pm
· Chuck Rosenberg, Unites States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia · Rodney A. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:30 am by Steven Cohen
United States District Court – Western District of Kentucky – November 13th, 2015 – This is a contract case involving imported gift products into the United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 3:52 am
The state defendants are immune from liability on Lewis’s state law wrongful discharge claim.The decision also considered “the exceptional significance of a government employee’s interest in testifying truthfully before a legislative committee,” referring to Piesco v City of New York, 933 F.2d 1149,. [read post]