Search for: "Libby v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2007, 5:02 pm
The district judge in Claiborne thought that the answer was yes, in light of the Supreme Court's conversion of the Guidelines from mandatory to advisory in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 12:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 7:43 am
" In this excerpt, Loftus describes her testimony in a pretrial hearing in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 5:28 pm
See United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 8:20 am
" Cochran argued the case of Rita v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 3:18 pm
United States Leaves More Open Than it Answers PRIMARY MATERIALS Sentencing Memoranda Submitted in US v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 4:05 pm
LIBBY "(U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 5:49 pm
In the case of U.S. v Wilson (32 US 150) the Supreme Court stated that a pardon is like a gift that can be refused, upholding the notion in Burdick v U.S. (236 US 79). [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 6:49 pm
" Ordinarily, courts decide for themselves what a statute means, after hearing from counsel on both sides; in the Libby case, Libby is on one side, the United States on the other; the President is not a party. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 1:59 pm
(The case is U.S. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 6:56 pm
Until a few years ago when the Supreme Court decided Booker v. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 9:57 pm
" Since the ruling in Branzburg v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 7:32 am
The Supreme Court has held that Morrison v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm
Supreme Court described it in Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 12:03 pm
In a world of politically fired up special prosecutors and Congress v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:42 pm
United States, holding that its decision in Johnson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2007, 10:39 pm
The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in the case of United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
Wilson, et al., v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 6:31 am
In re Parker; U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 12:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
