Search for: "Liberty v. Bennett" Results 1 - 20 of 109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
In 2011, the government’s Prevent strategy defined extremism as the “active opposition to fundamental British values, including democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty and the mutual respect and tolerance of different faiths and beliefs”. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
Until all people, Israelis and Palestinians, between the river and the sea, can live in peaceful liberty. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
Liberty and Big Brother Watch voiced their opposition to the policy. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
Read Liberty’s response to the judgment here. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am by INFORRM
” IPSO 022538-22 A woman v Mail Online, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02539-22 A woman v Daily Mail, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 10744-22 Gannon v Basildon Echo, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 09814-23 Leary v liverpoolecho.co.uk, 9 Reporting of a crime (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or… [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
Privacy advocates opposed to the legislation said the technology could be used to erode civil liberties and allows the government to deploy the technology on an “experimental basis” at large cultural events through the end of 2024, the Associated Press reports. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
Surveillance On 30 January 2023, the Investigatory Powers Tribunal found MI5 agents “unlawfully retained people’s intercepted data,” via the use of surveillance warrants from 2014-2019, Liberty and Privacy International v Security Service [2023] UKIPTrib1. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:40 am by SHG
Bennett, 564 U.S. 721, 755 (2011) (quoting Buckley v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am by INFORRM
Davis said the technology’s “advanced surveillance capabilities such as facial recognition, person tracking and gender identification” could threaten civil liberties and potentially national security. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
Liberty has hailed the judgment as a “landmark victory. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am by Bernard Bell
Bennett First, the panel explained, subject matter jurisdiction over an APA claim rests on the federal question statute, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
On 16 December 2021 Collins Rice J heard an application in the case of Spano v De Souza. [read post]