Search for: "Lightfoot v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 53
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2016, 9:54 am by Ronald Mann
The justices will be taking a trip back to Federal Courts class when they hear arguments next week in Lightfoot v Cendant Mortgage Corp. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:47 am by Lyle Denniston
Hellerstedt, the Justices simply denied review on Tuesday of two other cases by states seeking to defend similar laws: a Mississippi case, Currier v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the May 26, June 2, June 9, June 16, and June 23 Conferences)   New Relists Lightfoot v. [read post]
29 May 2016, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
With the federal government having recommended that review be granted, Lightfoot v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 10:40 am by Mark Murakami
Today marks the 40th anniversary of the sinking of the M/V Edmund Fitzgerald on Lake Superior in 1975. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
  As stated in Moore’s Federal Practice, “The identity of class members must be ascertainable by reference to objective criteria. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:18 am by Joy Waltemath
However, dismissal of the employee’s ADA retaliation claim was affirmed on other grounds (Lightfoot v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 10:41 am
 As is his evaluation of the relevant statute and legislative history.Actual attorneys will care only about the result:  Fannie Mae can sue and be sued in federal court, and (more importantly) can remove even state law cases there. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:25 am by Charon QC
  I record the first tomorrow with The Naked Lawyer, Chrissie Lightfoot And…. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:13 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Traversa v Freddi [2011] EWCA Civ 81 (14 February 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Lightfoot v Go-Ahead Group Plc [2011] EWHC 89 (QB) (01 February 2011) XYZ v Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust [2011] EWHC 243 (QB) (14 February 2011) British Pregnancy Advisory Service v Secretary of State for Health [2011] EWHC 235 (Admin) (14 February 2011) Poi v “Lina” [2011] EWHC 234 (QB) (14… [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]