Search for: "Lightfoot v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2017, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At Prawfsblawg, Richard Re discusses the court’s recent decision in Lightfoot v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Ten years later, the 118th Congress includes five Indian Americans; nearly 50 are in state Legislatures. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Becerra; and the Colorado baker gay-marriage case, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm by Bexis
  But we’ll let Kelly Lightfoot smack us down in her own words:In Regenerative Sciences, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 20569-23 Lightfoot v Edinburghlive.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation 21022-23 Maidment v Western Mail, 6 Children (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief and shock (2021), No breach – after investigation 21041-23 Joyce v Glamorgan Gazette, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 217440-23 Austin v The Daily… [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Two Families Got Fed Up with Their States’ Politics. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:25 am by Charon QC
  I record the first tomorrow with The Naked Lawyer, Chrissie Lightfoot And…. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 9:06 pm
Harris does use the word "radical":As stated previously, this will result in a need for better claim drafting and well-thought-out patent applications. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:16 am by Emma Snell
State Department, the group will be based largely in Poland and bring together multinational experts, including war crimes prosecutors and forensic specialists. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]