Search for: "Lillie v. Department of Labor"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2022, 7:59 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division (EEOC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:00 pm
As Orange County, California, Labor and Employment Lawyers, we have been following new developments this month in the Mikula v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 1:36 pm
Mikula v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 7:47 am
The Paycheck Fairness Act would increase remedies in Equal Pay Act cases, making available compensatory and punitive damages, authorizing class actions, and mandating training and other outreach efforts by the EEOC and the Labor Department's Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs on wage discrimination issues. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 4:55 pm
Department of Health and Services, that limited the ability of civil rights attorneys to receive attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:17 am
Eli Lilly & Co. and Jirak v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 7:00 am
Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 3:47 pm
Eli Lilly & Co. and Jirak v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 10:17 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., avoiding the Christopher v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:08 pm
Department of Labor offers an online tool for determining your FFCRA eligibility. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:46 am
Eli Lilly and Co., 2010 WL 3892464, at *1 (S.D. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 9:29 am
The comprehensive revisions to the Department of Labor's FMLA regulations became effective on January 16. [read post]
9 May 2012, 11:09 am
For example, the Seventh Circuit virtually ignored the amicus brief filed by the Department of Labor (“DOL”) in support of the Plaintiffs and the issue of whether and, if so, how much deference the court should give to the DOL's views. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Department of Labor implemented regulations that expanded the FMLA. [read post]
9 May 2012, 11:09 am
For example, the Seventh Circuit virtually ignored the amicus brief filed by the Department of Labor (“DOL”) in support of the Plaintiffs and the issue of whether and, if so, how much deference the court should give to the DOL's views. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:29 pm
The Task Force unites the EEOC, Department of Justice, Department of Labor, and Office of Personnel Management. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
Bank v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:57 am
Eli Lilly: Lawyers' Ads Are Hurting Patients
The Associated Press
Eli Lilly and Co., which has faced thousands of suits over its anti-psychotic Zyprexa, says lawyers' ads about the drug are prompting patients to stop taking mental illness medications when they shouldn't. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:52 pm
Rejecting the plaintiff’s argument that the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Ricci v DeStefano [92 EPD ¶43,602] controlled it’s analysis of the case, the appeals court found that the challenged plan was valid and that the plaintiff failed to establish that the Department’s justifications for the plan were pretextual (Shea v Kerry, August 7, 2015, 99 EPD ¶45,366). [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
opan style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> SCOTUS docket hereRicci v. [read post]
