Search for: "Lilly v. Commissioner" Results 1 - 20 of 64
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Rogers explains why it came last in Netflix rankings http://t.co/c0tGfLBb6e -> Interes Actavis UK v Eli Lilly & Company [2014] EWHC 1511 http://t.co/1Cw5ucuStG – patent judgment dealing with multi-jurisdictional claims -> Appeal allowed- reasons to follow Canadian Artists’ Representation v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
R (on the application of Davies and another) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and R (on the application of Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 6 – 7 July 2011. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:47 am by tracey
Supreme Court The Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council [2012] UKSC 34 (18 July 2012) Munir & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 32 (18 July 2012) Alvi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 33 (18 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Horn & Ors v Commercial Acceptances Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 958 (19 July 2012) Maidment v… [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:52 am by Laura Sandwell
Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company, heard 18 July 2011. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:52 am by Laura Sandwell
Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company, heard 18 July 2011. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am by Blog Editorial
Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company, heard 18 – 20 July 2011. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
Although this claim was not considered on its merits because it was time barred, the court (in preliminary proceedings) accepted that patent assignments may “unduly” lessen competition where “the assignment increases the assignees' market power in excess of that inherent in the patent rights assigned” (Eli Lilly v Apotex 2009 FC 991 at para. 750, 881, aff’d 2010 FCA 240; see also Apotex v Eli Lilly 2005 FCA 361). [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v DSD & Anor, heard 13-14 Mar 2017. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:11 am
(IP Watch) Exploring a new angle in the TRIPS and drug patents debate (Spicy IP) EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal rules on patenting a method of treatment by surgery: G1/07 (IPKat) (EPLAW) (Patent Baristas) EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal decides on dosage regime – Swiss-type claims no longer available: G 2/08 – Dosage Regime/Abbot Respiratory (EPLAW) (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPKat) (Patent Baristas) India: Victory for access to medicines as Bayer loses lawsuit in India (GenericsWeb)… [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:11 am
(IP Watch) Exploring a new angle in the TRIPS and drug patents debate (Spicy IP) EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal rules on patenting a method of treatment by surgery: G1/07 (IPKat) (EPLAW) (Patent Baristas) EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal decides on dosage regime – Swiss-type claims no longer available: G 2/08 – Dosage Regime/Abbot Respiratory (EPLAW) (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPKat) (Patent Baristas) India: Victory for access to medicines as Bayer loses lawsuit in India (GenericsWeb)… [read post]
2 May 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]